LOGIN

Forgot password?
Sign up today and your first download is free.
REGISTER

Court of International Trade

(Text Document)
April 08, 2010

(Inside U.S. Trade)
January 29, 2010

The U.S. subsidiary of a Swedish ball bearing manufacturer has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review a U.S. appeals court decision that found the firm could not receive distributions of anti-dumping duties under the Byrd Amendment from an antidumping case it had initially opposed.

(Inside U.S. Trade)
December 11, 2009

The U.S. government this week appealed a controversial U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) decision that last summer found that the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative owed U.S. importers refunds of retaliatory duties that the U.S. maintained from July 29, 2007 until March 23, 2009.

(Daily News)
September 23, 2009

On Sept. 18, Court of International Trade Senior Judge Kenton Musgrave denied a request by Gilda Industries Inc. that all the lawsuits filed on behalf of importers seeking refunds from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative of retaliatory duties paid over 20 months be handled together as one class action suit.


(Daily News)
September 21, 2009

In a ruling with substantial implications for the future of trade remedy law against China, the Court of International Trade (CIT) late last week curtailed the ability of the Commerce Department to simultaneously apply both antidumping (AD) duties and countervailing duties (CVD) against the same imported product from a non-market economy.


(Text Document)
September 21, 2009

Pages